Goal 1: To support regional workforce needs, the program seeks for at least 25% of graduates to practice within one of its primary clinical partner organizations; Geisinger Health System, WellSpan Health, or UPMC
Success in meeting Goal 1: Met
To determine our effectiveness in meeting this goal, we utilize the following data sources:
1. Post-graduate Program Data on Job placement location
| Class of 2024 | Class of 2025 | Class of 2026 |
Graduates hired within UPMC, Wellspan or Geisinger Health Systems | 58.3% | 30.4% | pending |
Goal 2: The program will prepare graduates with the foundational medical knowledge for entry-level clinical practice.
Success in meeting Goal 2: Partially Met
To determine our effectiveness in meeting this goal, we utilize the following data sources:
1. Preceptor ratings of student’s critical thinking skills during clinical rotations
This table summarizes the mean score of preceptor ratings of student’s execution of clinical procedures appropriate to the rotation displayed by graduating class (The rating scale is 45%=Strongly Disagree, 60%=Disagree, 85%=Agree, 100%=Strongly Agree). Data is collected from the Preceptor Evaluation of the Student, in Typhon. The evaluation is conducted at the end of each clinical rotation.
Benchmark: The benchmark for all curriculum-based evaluations (evaluations pertaining to the didactic or clinical year) is 85% which correlates to “Agree”.
Preceptor Assessment | Class of 2024 | Class of 2025 | Class of 2026 |
Critical Thinking Skills | 92% | 97% | 98% |
2. Above national mean program performance on the PAEA End of Curriculum
This table summarizes the average cohort score on the End of Curriculum Exam compared to the National Mean. Data is collected from the PAEA’s assessment hub.
Benchmark: The benchmark is that our program’s performance is above national mean for the EOCE administered through PAEA.
PAEA EOCE | Class of 2024 | Class of 2025 | Class of 2026 |
Program Average | 1502 | 1529 | 1546 |
National Mean | 1516 | 1516 | 1516 |
3. Above national mean program performance on the PANCE
PANCE 1st time PASS | Class of 2024 | Class of 2025 | Class of 2026 |
Program | 83% | 96% | Pending |
National Mean | 92% | 92% | Pending |
Goal 3: The program will deliver an integrated curriculum that emphasizes hands-on learning.
Success in meeting Goal 3: Met
To determine our effectiveness in meeting this goal, we utilize the following data sources:
1. Intentional scaffolding of hands-on skills across the curriculum
The Diagnostics & Procedural Practices I Course is the first in a three-part series that introduces foundational diagnostic and therapeutic procedures commonly performed by physician assistants. Skills are intentionally scaffolded throughout the curriculum, with reinforcement and assessment occurring in subsequent courses and semesters.
For example, students first learn and demonstrate handwashing, gloving, and aseptic technique during the Injection Competency. These skills are then reinforced in Diagnostics & Procedural Practices II through vascular access and phlebotomy, and later applied in the Medical Decision Making and Principles of Emergency Medicine & General Surgery courses during OSCEs and simulated clinical scenarios
Mastery of these foundational skills is ultimately assessed through summative technical skills evaluations, which may include procedures such as intravenous insertion, urinary catheter placement, phlebotomy, knee injection, and/or suturing.
The Diagnostics & Procedural Practices II Course is the second in a three-part series and introduces advanced diagnostic and therapeutic procedures commonly performed by physician assistants. New technical skills introduced during the second semester are intentionally reinforced and assessed throughout subsequent coursework.
Students develop competency in 4- and 12-lead EKG application and interpretation, vascular access, and phlebotomy. These skills are reinforced through hands-on, scenario-based learning in the Medical Decision Making and Principles of Emergency Medicine & General Surgery. Students generally enter BLS certification, and CPR skills are then reinforced in Diagnostics and Procedural Practices II series. In the final Diagnostics and Procedural Practices series (III), students build on their CPR skills and EKG knowledge by learning ACLS algorithms and participating in mock code scenarios.
The Principles of Emergency Medicine & General Surgery Course builds on procedural skills introduced earlier in the curriculum by reinforcing suturing, advanced surgical instruments, and aseptic technique through simulated operating room experiences. Students apply these skills in increasingly complex, problem-based clinical scenarios that integrate history taking, physical examination, and diagnostic reasoning. Through this structured progression, the course strengthens both technical competence and clinical decision-making in authentic patient care settings
2. Preceptor feedback on students’ procedural skills
This table summarizes the mean score of preceptor ratings of student’s execution of clinical procedures appropriate to the rotation displayed by graduating class (The rating scale is 45%=Strongly Disagree, 60%=Disagree, 85%=Agree, 100%=Strongly Agree). Data is collected from the Preceptor Evaluation of the Student, in Typhon. The evaluation is conducted at the end of each clinical rotation.
Benchmark: The benchmark for all curriculum-based evaluations (evaluations pertaining to the didactic or clinical year) is 85% which correlates to “Agree”.
Preceptor Assessment | Class of 2024 | Class of 2025 | Class of 2026 |
Execution of clinical skills | 98% | 97% | 96% |
3. Student feedback from end-of-curriculum survey
This table summarizes the mean score of student’s self-assessment on their exit survey of their confidence in performing PA specific procedural skills by graduating class. The rating scale is 1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Agree, 4=Strongly Agree). Data is collected from an anonymous end of curriculum/program surgery in Typhon. The evaluation is conducted within 60 days of graduation.
Benchmark: The benchmark for all graduate assessment of their confidence in the clinical and technical skills is a 3.0 which aligns with Agree.
Student Assessment | Class of 2024 | Class of 2025 | Class of 2026 |
“I feel confident in performing PA specific clinical procedures/skills “ | NA | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Goal 4: The program will graduate students who demonstrate effective communication and teamwork skills
Success in meeting Goal 4: Met
To determine our effectiveness in meeting this goal, we utilize the following data sources:
1. Direct observation and assessment in teamwork skills in Medical Decision Making
This table summarizes the average cohort grade received for the measure of “effectively participated in team discussions with collaboration and respect”. Data is collected from the rubric on the Team OSCE in the Medical Decision-Making course, Summer Didactic year.
Benchmark: The benchmark for all course grading components is ≥75% as this correlates with a passing grade in the program.
Student Assessment | Class of 2024 | Class of 2025 | Class of 2026 |
“Student effectively participated in team discussions with collaboration and respect” | NA | 100% | 100% |
2. Through direct observation and assessment in: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs)
This table summarizes the average cohort grade received for the pediatric competency examination measure of “Student discusses with the parent the child's physical exam findings with words that are easily understood by the parent”. Data is collected from the rubric on the Pediatric Exam Competency in the Patient History and Physical Assessment III course, Summer Didactic year.
Benchmark: The benchmark for all course grading components is ≥75% as this correlates with a passing grade in the program.
Student Assessment | Class of 2024 | Class of 2025 | Class of 2026 |
“Student discusses with the parent the child’s physical exam findings with words that are easily understood by the parent (who is not a healthcare professional and does not understand medical words)” | 100% | 100% | 100% |
3. Summative OSCE
This table summarizes the average cohort grade received for the program competency assessment of “Demonstrate effective interpersonal communication skills”. Data is collected from the program’s summative evaluation completed within 4 months of program completion. This measure was assessed during the comprehensive OSCE.
Benchmark: The benchmark for all course grading components is ≥75% as this correlates with a passing grade in the program.
Summative OSCE | Class of 2024 | Class of 2025 | Class of 2026 |
“Demonstrate effective interpersonal communication skills” | 100% | 100% | 99% |
4. Preceptor evaluations
This table summarizes the mean score of preceptor ratings of student’s composing patient education commensurate with the patient’s level of understanding for select medical conditions commonly encountered in the family medicine setting displayed by graduating class (The rating scale is 45%=Strongly Disagree, 60%=Disagree, 85%=Agree, 100%=Strongly Agree). Data is collected from the Preceptor Evaluation of the Student, in Typhon. The evaluation is conducted at the end of the family medicine clinical experience course.
Benchmark: The benchmark for all curriculum-based evaluations (evaluations pertaining to the didactic or clinical year) is 85% which correlates to “Agree”.
Student Assessment | Class of 2024 | Class of 2025 | Class of 2026 |
“Student composes patient education commensurate with the patient’s level of understanding for select medical conditions commonly encountered in the family medicine setting” | 98% | 98% | 97% |