Grow PA Scholarship Grant ProgramUp to $5,000 Annual Awards Available. All Penn College discipline-specific associate's and bachelor's degrees pre-qualify.
As explained in the Mid-project Update, November 2007, the QTA Committee developed and distributed a Faculty Survey of Assessment Mechanisms at the beginning of the Fall 2007 semester. The aggregated results of that survey follow.
Regularly
Occasionally
Rarely/Never
Total Responses
Non-responses
Assessment Mechanisms
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
01. Tests developed by myself
166
90.2%
17
9.2%
1
0.5%
184
100.0%
0
0.0%
02. Tests developed by the department/program
24
13.0%
46
25.0%
112
60/9%
182
98.9%
2
1.1%
03. Textbook exams that come from a test bank or textbook
16. Graded homework (in addition t%ther than reading a text)
111
60.3%
60
32.6%
12
6.5%
183
99.5%
1
0.5%
17. Standardized tests (e.g. prepared from outside, competency tests, program-specific tests, MS cert.)
33
17.9%
33
17.9%
115
62.5%
181
98.4%
3
1.6%
18. Internship/co-op/practicum - Evaluation sheets from College
43
23.4%
23
12.5%
112
60.9%
178
96.7%
6
3.3%
18. Internship/co-op/practicum - Other evaluation
35
19.0%
19
10.3%
116
63.0%
170
92.4%
14
7.6%
19. Personal interview
26
14.1%
67
36.4%
87
47.3%
180
97.8%
4
2.2%
20. Lab evaluations
126
68.5%
25
13.6%
30
16.3%
181
98.4%
3
1.6%
21. Group projects
93
50.5%
64
34.8%
25
13.6%
182
98.9%
2
1.1
22. Presentations (oral, visual)
85
46.2%
72
39.1%
27
14.7%
184
100.0%
0
0.0%
23. Reviews from PCT entity (other than supervisor)
7
3.8%
46
25.0%
128
69.6%
181
98.4%
3
1.6%
24. Reviews from non-PCT entity
16
8.7%
35
19.0%
129
70.1%
180
97.8%
4
2.2%
25. Rubrics
60
32.6%
54
29.3%
67
36.4%
181
98.4%
3
1.6%
26. Other
12
6.5%
11
6.0%
52
28.3%
75
40.8%
109
59.2%
The survey included several open-ended questions in an effort to gain qualitative feedback on the assessment processes currently in use for program review, accreditation, and certification. The answers to these questions were analyzed to determine common themes represented by the respondents. The questions and the four common themes are presented below:
Open-ended Questions
What are any recommendations you might have for the [program review, accreditation, and certification] process?
How could the College’s process be improved?
What resources would be helpful to you for program review/accreditation/certification/endorsement?
Response Themes
Faculty recommend that more assistance be provided for the assessment processes in place at Penn College. They noted the need for help in the form of a facilitator, leader, or coordinator.
Faculty recommend that the assessment processes involve more stakeholders.
Faculty recommend that the processes become streamlined and be made perpetual.
Faculty recommend that more support be provided for the assessment process in the form of staffing (as noted above), data provision, and stipends or release time to do assessment.